Patient-specific modelling for the assessment of the hemodynamics risk of failure in endovascular aneurysm repair

Authors

  • Maurizio Lodi Rizzini PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin; Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research
  • Paola Tasso PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin; Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research
  • Anastasios Raptis Laboratory for Vascular Simulations, Institute of Vascular Diseases, Larissa, Larissa;
  • Miltiadis Matsagkas Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Thessaly
  • Diego Gallo PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin; Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research
  • Michalis Xenos Department of Mathematics University of Ioannina, Ioannina
  • Umberto Morbiducci PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin; Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.175

Keywords:

AAA, EVAR, helical flow, displacement forces

Abstract

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), despite its advantages over abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open surgery, still presents risks of failure linked to Endograft (EG) migration. We here explore the link between intravascular blood flow features and Displacement Forces (DFs) acting on the EG. DFs are inversely associated with the amount of helical flow within the EG.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Downloads

Published

29-09-2021

Issue

Section

Communications

How to Cite

Patient-specific modelling for the assessment of the hemodynamics risk of failure in endovascular aneurysm repair. (2021). Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.175